Riemannian Geometry and General Relativity

(Differential Geometry-2, MTH 3412, Winter 1997 )

Professor M.Shubin


Course Description:

Riemannian geometry is designed to describe the universe of creatures who live on a curved surface or in a curved space and do not know about the world of higher dimensions or do not have any access to it.

One of the main notions of the Riemannian geometry is the notion of connection, which is, in fact, the key notion of the entire geometry, though it is not always explicitly formulated. The connection (or parallel transport) allows to compare what is happening at two distant points of a curved space, in spite of the fact that there is no direct and immediate way to communicate between these points. Recently connections appeared in the theory of gauge fields which is considered a basis of the modern physics of elementary particles. Earlier, in the 1910's, A.Einstein discovered that the Riemannian geometry can be successfully used to describe General Relativity which is in fact a classical theory of gravitation. (Here the word ``classical" stands as opposite to ``quantum", but the quantum theory of gravitation is still terra incognita!)

By its intrinsic beauty, as well as by wealth of applications the Riemannian geometry lies at the core of modern mathematics.

The subjects covered in the course are as follows:

The grade is based on weekly home assignments. They are, perhaps, the most important part of the course.

Note:

Due to a new version of this course being offered in the Winter 2005 semester, access to solutions has been disabled.

Home Assignment 1
Solutions to Home Assignment 1
Home Assignment 2
Solutions to Home Assignment 2
Home Assignment 3
Solutions to Home Assignment 3
Home Assignment 4
Solutions to Home Assignment 4

(You can find the TeX and dvi files here. )

Textbooks:

1. Riemannian Geometry, by Manfredo Perdigão do Carmo. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993.

2. General Theory of Relativity, by P.A.M.Dirac. Princeton University Press, 1996.

The textbooks complement one another. The first one (M.P. do Carmo) is mathematical, and it is not large, very well written, self-contained and has a good set of exercises. The second one (P.A.M. Dirac) is a physics classic, brilliantly written, very short (69 pages) and cheap. It is also self-contained but from a physicist's point of view. Reading both books (which sometimes describe the same topics but quite differently in style) you will have a chance to compare mathematical and physical approaches, which should lead to a deeper understanding.

Office: 460 Lake Hall. Phone: Ext.5676 E-mail: shubin@neu.edu

Class meetings: Tuesday and Thursday 7:15 -- 8:45 p.m.




Sergey Bratus
Thu Mar 6 01:47:28 EST 1997